I have to be honest with you guys: I love this game. Instead of giving this game a 1,000 word long blow-job, I will summarize here: The game is absolutely beautiful to look at. The story is well-written and carefully plotted throughout. Environments are immaculately detailed to the point where you can just walk around without ever pulling a trigger and be completely enthralled. Little details such as posters, slaves in stockades, and segregated bathrooms all breathe life into the world. The character designs are great. Elizabeth is probably one of the most interesting and important female protagonists in gaming right now. Chances are, you've already bought this game. You've probably read articles on Metacritic, or perhaps you've watched a video by far more qualified game reviewers than myself who have all given this game glowing scores.
Now that I've gotten all of that out of
the way, I feel as though I can talk about the game more objectively.
The Bioshock series has always been a very story driven affair. From
the moment you step out of your first bathysphere in Rapture, to when
you are greeted by the bright, blue skies of Columbia, story has
always been a driving factor. The difference between Bioshock and
Infinite however, is that while one had a strong story that served to
color the setting and drive the game forward, story wasn't the sole
focus of the experience. In the case of Bioshock Infinite, story is
such a huge focus that other elements of the game actually suffer.
One of the most annoying aspects of the
gameplay had to be the gun layout. Specifically, you can only carry
two guns at any given time. Moreover, you cannot buy guns from any
store in the game. You acquire weapons by either finding them in the
environment or lifting them off of the bodies of your enemies. There
are several problems with this. The first problem being a matter of
planning. You see, the game has several stations throughout where you
can purchase upgrades. While this is pretty standard fare for a
shooter, it becomes problematic because you never know which two guns
you'll likely use. You can start out with a pistol and a machine gun
in the beginning, only to be using a shotgun and an RPG later on. I
never felt sure as to which guns should be upgraded because I never
knew what I would need. If I ran out of ammo for my main guns during
a firefight, I had to rely on whatever my enemies' had dropped.
(Handymen: You will learn to hate them.) |
This problem is mitigated with the
addition of Elizabeth. She has the ability to open up “tears,”
which are rips in reality. With this power she can pull in gun
turrets, cover, hook-lines, and ammo caches from other worlds.
Another plus comes in that she will search the battlefield for ammo,
money, healing items, and Salts(Infinite's replacement for EVE), to
give to you during a fight. It is a solid design choice, but it
doesn't always fix the problem with guns.
The combat works quite well. The ability to use a different combination of vigors and guns, as well as Elizabeth's tear ability add a dynamic aspect to the combat. More than that, using the sky-hooks to avoid enemy fire and shoot back, or use your powers, or perform one-hit kills is very satisfying.
The combat works quite well. The ability to use a different combination of vigors and guns, as well as Elizabeth's tear ability add a dynamic aspect to the combat. More than that, using the sky-hooks to avoid enemy fire and shoot back, or use your powers, or perform one-hit kills is very satisfying.
This brings me to the next topic I want
to discuss: Columbia itself. The world is beautiful, rich, and
fascinating. At least, it seems that way at first glance. The problem
comes in engagement. Non-playable characters will engage in a line or
two of dialogue with Booker, and then never speak to him again. You
can play a few carnival games, buy some cotton candy, but interaction
never goes beyond this point. It's almost as if you're on an
anthropological tour. You can observe, but you cannot interact in any
meaningful way.
The game is all about Elizabeth. It's her story, one that focuses primarily on her growth and development. She is the story's main character and it shows with how her development drives the plot. Booker plays an important role, of course, but it's one that isn't made apparent until the very end. While this is great, the story-driven focus does take away from some of Infinite's appeal. It isn't that the story isn't great. It is, but there's so much focus on it that engagement in the setting suffers. There seem to be missed opportunities where the player could have been more engaged in the city itself, instead of chasing Elizabeth around.
(Elizabeth: Bioshock Infinite's main character) |
Overall though, the game is very good. The problems above are nit-picking at best, though. There are some great commentaries on social issues, game design, alternate realities, racial tension, and religious fanaticism. The presentation is absolutely fantastic, complete with vibrant visuals, music, and architecture. The writing is incredible and the voice acting is spot-on. This game easily earns a place amongst Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem, Silent Hill 2, Mass Effect, Half-Life, and Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty for games that show the true potential of the medium.
Buy this game. Now.
Buy this game. Now.
Final score: 4 out of 5.
Elizabeth is sorta cute.
ReplyDeleteYou would hit it?
ReplyDeleteI thought the "only two guns at a time" thing was pretty standard at this point in video games.
ReplyDeleteNot exactly. My shooter experience comes from things like Borderlands and the first Bioshock, which had full weapon inventories.
ReplyDeleteAh. The handful of random games I've played in the past few years have just happened to have 0-2 weapons.
ReplyDelete